Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible typo error in revision history in a draft #8430

Closed
1 task done
jle-pass opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

Possible typo error in revision history in a draft #8430

jle-pass opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jle-pass
Copy link

Description

Hi,

In the draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/
I see two "draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-09"
Maybe a gap error between "draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-09" and "draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-12" (missing "draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-11" ?) or not an error.

Greetings.

Code of Conduct

@jle-pass jle-pass added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 17, 2025
@jennifer-richards
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the report, but I'm not sure what part of the page you're referring to. The page looks correct to me. Can you double-check in case there was a temporary issue and, if it still does not look like what you expect, include a screen shot or more specific description of what looks wrong?

Thanks!

@jle-pass
Copy link
Author

jle-pass commented Jan 21, 2025

Possible typo error in revision history

Image

@rjsparks
Copy link
Member

That's draft content - it comes from draft authors/editors and isn't something the datatracker did.
The question should go to the list or the authors directly.
Closing this issue here as it's not a datatracker issue.

@rjsparks rjsparks closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants