-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Summary of the 20 issues in Herbsleb's 2014 FSE paper. #6
Comments
Something Herbsleb missed, while MT workers found them.SupportThey don't indicate (17), which also shows support in the comment.
Suggest alternative solutionsThey don't indicate (16) and (21), which also has someone proposing alternate solutions. (16)
(20)
Disapprove of the solution. *The missed (3) which did question the solution approach.
Outcome - AcceptedThey missed (10), which is merged in fact, even though we can only see the 'closed' label. But core said 'merged'. Check the contribution page for this submitter, we can find his commits for this PR has been merged. Need to pay attention to this one. Core helped submitter merged. While API says closed without a 'merged' label
|
@dichen001 , thanks for good summarization! Just for clarification, which "MT workers" do you mean in the last comment? |
All(20) the pull requests they studied.
Categories they summarized.
Issues around code contribution
- (2,4,8,9,10,11,17,18,20)
- (2,7,8,9,11,15,19)
- (implement their own and adervertise: 2,3,13,15)
Methods of Influencing the decision process
Outcomes for the proposed code contributions
Submitters prior experience
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: