Finding Channel Management tedious. Can we use the default Channel Implementation in @grpc/grpc-js? #701
Unanswered
akash931127
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi! Thanks for raising this. Could you clarify a bit more about the issue you’re facing with channel management? Are you looking for a way to automatically manage channels without manually creating or reusing them? Or is there something specific about the current behavior in @grpc/grpc-js or nice-grpc that isn’t working for your use case? If you can share a specific example or a bit more detail, it will help the community understand and suggest better solutions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, I was going through the code because I am finding managing channels among clients very tedious. I was trying to see if there was a default Channel Management already present in the underlying @grpc/grpc-js library.
I went through the following path:
I am trying to avoid taking on the channel management as much as possible. What are the communities thoughts here? Should we provide the ability to use the default implementations available the underlying @grpc/grpc-js?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions