azure: Configure dedicated azurerm_route and remove inline Route config from azurerm_route_table

[ytsarev]

What problem are you facing?

Currently, we define a Route inline within RouteTable, see /~https://github.com/upbound/official-providers/blob/main/provider-azure/examples/network/routetable.yaml

RouteTable resource: https://marketplace.upbound.io/providers/upbound/provider-azure/latest/resources/network.azure.upbound.io/RouteTable/v1beta1

If we look at https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/3.8.0/docs/resources/route , we can observe

According to our general strategy documented /~https://github.com/upbound/official-providers/blob/main/docs/new-v1beta1-resource.md?plain=1#L36-L52 we should configure Route as a separate CRD

azurerm_route is also part of Allianz SoW as a result of their terraform state analysis

Provider Name: azure
Provider Version: v0.14.1

How could Official Providers help solve your problem?

• Configure azurerm_route as a separate resource
• Adjust azurerm_route_table accordingly with config.MoveToStatus
• Provide uptest compatible examples

[turkenf]

• Configure azurerm_route as a separate resource
• Provide uptest compatible examples

The azurerm_route resource is configured as uptestable in this PR.

• Adjust azurerm_route_table accordingly with config.MoveToStatus

This still needs to be done.

[github-actions]

This provider repo does not have enough maintainers to address every issue. Since there has been no activity in the last 90 days it is now marked as stale. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. Leaving a comment starting with /fresh will mark this issue as not stale.

[github-actions]

This issue is being closed since there has been no activity for 14 days since marking it as stale. If you still need help, feel free to comment or reopen the issue!