Remove Lazy in storage items
#78
Comments
|
Hi, thank you for letting me know! I'm aware of the removal of some storage data structures, so I'll update our code later. Also, I'm looking forward to revamping our contracts with the |
Yep! Should definitely clean things up a bit |
tash-2s
added a commit
to tash-2s/open-emoji-battler
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2022
This commit has two changes. 1. Remove `Lazy` usages: close OpenEmojiBattler#78 2. Use `Option` to clarify unset values We should be able to clearly differentiate whether none or empty data for these items.
Merged
forbesus
added a commit
to forbesus/OpenEmojiBattler
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2024
This commit has two changes. 1. Remove `Lazy` usages: close OpenEmojiBattler/open-emoji-battler#78 2. Use `Option` to clarify unset values We should be able to clearly differentiate whether none or empty data for these items.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hey there, cool project!
This is more of an FYI in case you're not following the ink! repo, but with the next release we're getting rid of
ink_storage::lazy::Lazy, which I see you're using in yourstoragecontract.I'd also be curious to know if you notice any performance issues due to it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: