-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handling NA
s in covariate data
#23
Comments
@sigmafelix If a category exists at some location, but is non-existent in a given location, is it not a true zero? |
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology I think these values are unmeasured (unknown) than true zeros. For example, in the soil chemistry data, some locations got measurements of tens of elements while others only got a handful. The latter will have |
@sigmafelix can you direct me to the source of the soil chemistry data generation? |
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology Pivoting from a long to a wide table fills |
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology data_AZO_covariates.qs (
|
@sigmafelix I like your recommendations - I think we should keep it simple and only do sum or mean. As for the point- there are no exact pixel extractions anymore? I'm good with that, but just wanted to check. |
@Spatiotemporal-Exposures-and-Toxicology |
NA
s are not true zero as there are nonexistent categories (e.g., soil chemistry)NA
s in the covariate data as wellNA
s are truly zeroNA
s or to exclude the field?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: