[Question] How to reduce visibility of modules to KoinComponent level with Koin 2.0.0-rc-2?

[AidanLaing]

This issue was resolved for me in #224 with the introduction of KoinContext. Since it seems that has been removed in 2.0.0-rc-2 I've updated my SDK module to use the scope API.

I'm now getting the error message Already existing definition or try to override an existing one: [type:Scope,class:'okhttp3.OkHttpClient'] when trying to loadKoinModules(...) in my SDK client. I was expecting there to be no conflict since the OkHttpClient in my SDK module is scoped.

Is there something I'm missing with the new scope API? Is there a way for me to load in the SDK module without raising a conflict? It would be great if I could start another Koin instance that is completely separate from my app's instance so my SDK users would never have to run into this issue.

Here is a snippet of my app's module:

module {
    single { createOkHttpClient(androidContext(), get(), get()) }
}

Here is a snippet of my SDK's module:

module {
    scope(named(Scopes.PEPPER.name)) {
        scoped { createOkHttpClient(get(), get()) }
    }
}

Here is a snippet of my KoinComponent:

) : KoinComponent {

    private val scope: Scope = getKoin().getOrCreateScope(Scopes.PEPPER.name, named(Scopes.PEPPER.name))

    override fun currentScope(): Scope? = scope

[AidanLaing]

I was able to resolve this myself 10 mins after posting this 🤦‍♂️No need for the scope API it seems.
Here is how I separated the Koin instances incase anyone else is confused:

) : KoinComponent {

    private val koinApplication = KoinApplication.create().apply {
        properties(...)
        modules(...)
    }

    override fun getKoin(): Koin = koinApplication.koin

    val userDataSource: UserDataSource by inject()
    ...