-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
a termination call to an orchestrator doesn't terminate any sub-orchestrations it started #153
Comments
We might want to make this an optional behavior. Thoughts? |
That makes sense. I could see where in some scenarios you might want to leave a sub-orchestrator running. Perhaps handle it as an optional parameter on the terminate method? |
@simonporter what is the expected behavior in the Durable Task Framework? Should a terminate message terminate a parent orchestration and all it's children, or just the parent? |
@cgillum did you ever hear back from @simonporter on how this works in the Durable Task Framework? |
The current behavior in the default provider is that a terminate call on the parent will only terminate the parent, it does not propagate to the children. |
I'm starting to use DF in a more or less complex scenario, and this was driving me crazy! I think this is a very reasonable feature request, specially since the role of an orchestrator is to orchestrate! |
If we could have this #243 |
@andreujuanc can you open a separate issue to track making the parent instance ID available to the sub-orchestrator? That might be a simple thing for us to add soon'ish. |
Hi @cgillum, @simonporter just to confirm where did it land, the Orchestration Termination kills the sub-orchestrators as well? I can't find any documentation about that. |
Hello, I hope this issue gets resolved as soon as possible. |
Closing as a duplicate of #506. |
terminating an orchestrator should also terminate the sub-orchestrators it has started but this is not the case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: